Thursday, August 22, 2019

Latest Judgements

“Summary adjudication of a technically complex suit,” says the Supreme Court, is “neither desirable...

The Supreme Court characterizes the subject matter of the case — an inquiry into whether Nuziveedu was infringing Monsanto’s patent — as scientific and...

Quintessential, of dispute arose on account of the Defendant’s alleged infringement and passing...

The dispute between the parties arose on account of the Defendant’s alleged infringement and passing off of the Plaintiff’s mark “KHANDANI SHAFAKHANA” by using...

For finding a person guilty of willful disobedience of the order under XXXIX Rule...

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No(s). 5775 OF 2019 (Arising out of SLP(C)No.2910 of 2016) U.C. SURENDRANATH Appellant(s) VERSUS MAMBALLY’S BAKERY Respondent(s) J U D...

PASSING OFF ‘two remedies, one under the purview of Companies Act, 2013 which...

The Court granted a decree of permanent injunction restraining the Defendant from infringing and passing off the Plaintiff’s mark “THERMAX” by using a deceptively...

BOOKMY in fact follows 2016 Dehi HC (DB) ruling on word TODAY.

CLAIM IN APPEAL The first plaintiff is owner and publisher of the weekly news magazine "INDIA TODAY" which has a significant  holding in its sphere...

CROCS – Appeal to DB, Delhi HC “what appears from the record is that...

HELD by DB MERITS "what appears from the record is that the two designs, over which Crocs Inc claims novelty and originality are repetitions of age-old...

“ The comparative advertising campaign should thus be ‘comparison positive’. Rules Delhi High Court

“ The comparative advertising campaign should thus be ‘comparison positive’. Advertisements often contain valuable information for the consumers and can promote healthy competition in the...

The plaintiff’s case here relied upon a detailed comparison to urge that the...

“While the advertisement’s emphasis is on the manufacturing process of the tyre and its radial design,” says Mr Justice Manmohan, “the Defendant’s advertisement...

Delhi High Court issues injunction to Parsar Bharati against use of “DD Free Dish”

Delhi High Court holds against the Defendant the fact that it did not challenge the validity of the Claimant’s registration, and...

Delhi High Court in, Mylan Laboratories v. Union of India, sets the ball rolling...

In Mylan Laboratories v. Union of India, DEL HC, HELD " This Court is of the view that...

VISTARA deserves to be declared a well-known mark: Delhi HC restrains web portal from...

VISTARA deserves to be declared a well-known mark: Delhi HC restrains web portal from selling products with airline's mark Aditi Singh August 12 2019

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA…….” clear that all questions with regard to the validity of...

(2017) AIR(SCW) 5619 : (2017) AIR(SC) 5619 : (2018) 1 ApexCourtJudgments(SC) 543 : (2018) 1 BCR 324 : (2017) 12 JT 577 : (2017)...

FIVE JUDGE BENCH DECISION OF DELHI HIGH COURT “…..maintainability of a composite suit...

2019  (77) PTC  1 (DELHI) (2019) AIR(Delhi) 23 : (2019) 256 DLT 1 DELHI HIGH COURT SPECIAL BENCH

Challenge under, Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 124 by FIITJEE for injunction using...

2019  (77) PTC  667 (DELHI) (DB) DELHI HIGH COURT DIVISION BENCH BRAHMOS AEROSPACE PVT LTD. — Appellant  Vs.  FIIT JEE LIMITED AND ANR — Respondent

Recent Judgements

Most Popular

“Summary adjudication of a technically complex suit,” says the Supreme Court,...

The Supreme Court characterizes the subject matter of the case — an inquiry into whether Nuziveedu was infringing Monsanto’s patent — as scientific and...

Quintessential, of dispute arose on account of the Defendant’s alleged...

The dispute between the parties arose on account of the Defendant’s alleged infringement and passing off of the Plaintiff’s mark “KHANDANI SHAFAKHANA” by using...

For finding a person guilty of willful disobedience of the order...

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No(s). 5775 OF 2019 (Arising out of SLP(C)No.2910 of 2016) U.C. SURENDRANATH Appellant(s) VERSUS MAMBALLY’S BAKERY Respondent(s) J U D...

PASSING OFF ‘two remedies, one under the purview of Companies...

The Court granted a decree of permanent injunction restraining the Defendant from infringing and passing off the Plaintiff’s mark “THERMAX” by using a deceptively...

BOOKMY in fact follows 2016 Dehi HC (DB) ruling on...

CLAIM IN APPEAL The first plaintiff is owner and publisher of the weekly news magazine "INDIA TODAY" which has a significant  holding in its sphere...

CROCS – Appeal to DB, Delhi HC “what appears from the...

HELD by DB MERITS "what appears from the record is that the two designs, over which Crocs Inc claims novelty and originality are repetitions of age-old...