Copyright Court agreed to the defendant’s request to grant them (Ropso.com content sharing site) two days time to sit with the plaintiff and ensure legal compliances September 1, 2020September 1, 2020 Indian IPR This content is restricted to site members. If you are an existing user, please log in. New users may register below.Existing Users Log InUsername or EmailPassword Remember Me Forgot password? Click here to resetNew User? Click here to register Related Posts Copyright Supreme Court set aside the Madras High Court’s judgment that had modified the application of Rule 29(4) of Copyright Rules, 2013 applicable to the statutory licensing regime under Section 31D of the Copyright Act, finding that it rewrote the words of the statute. October 12, 2021October 12, 2021 Indian IPR Copyright Held that the mere presence of a mark on the Register would not lead to automatic success in an action for infringement, and it was imperative to demonstrate continuous and sustained use of the mark to exemplify its distinctiveness. June 20, 2021 Indian IPR
