Home Trade Marks Court held that an abbreviation of descriptive words cannot be used as... Trade Marks Court held that an abbreviation of descriptive words cannot be used as a trademark if it is a generic term with generic connotations, unless the abbreviation itself could be demonstrated to have acquired a secondary meaning. By Indian IPR - September 20, 2020 0 180 Facebook Twitter Google+ Pinterest WhatsApp This content is restricted to site members. If you are an existing user, please log in. New users may register below.Existing Users Log InUsername or EmailPassword Remember Me Forgot password? Click here to resetNew User? Click here to register RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR Trade Marks While considering an application for stay of proceedings under Section 124 of the Trademarks Act, 1999 (‘Trademarks Act’), the Court held that there was... Trade Marks While reiterating that registration of assignment is mandatory in terms of Section 45 of the Trade Marks Act (‘Trademarks Act’), the Court however observed... Trade Marks HELD that use of the word ‘Luxuria’ infringes upon the trademark ‘Luxura’ for comfort buses Recent Judgements HELD “…. the power to grant ad hoc compulsory licence, cannot be implied. No... Copyright Indian IPR - October 5, 2020 0 HELD A conjoint reading of Section 11 of the Copyright Act and Section 83... Copyright Indian IPR - October 5, 2020 0 Copyright Board fixes royalty rate at 2% of the net advertisement revenues of... Copyright Indian IPR - October 5, 2020 0 Section 31D of the Copyright Act, 1957, which was added by the Copyright (Amendment)... IPAB Indian IPR - October 5, 2020 0 Court rejected an argument that the right given to a patentee under Section 48... Patent Indian IPR - September 20, 2020 0 While considering an application for stay of proceedings under Section 124 of the Trademarks... Trade Marks Indian IPR - September 20, 2020 0 Held that prior to obtaining registration under the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’... Plant Variety Indian IPR - September 20, 2020 0 Relying on the judgment of the Supreme Court in Indian Performing Rites Society vs.... Copyright Indian IPR - September 20, 2020 0 While reiterating that registration of assignment is mandatory in terms of Section 45 of... Trade Marks Indian IPR - September 20, 2020 0 Court held that an abbreviation of descriptive words cannot be used as a trademark... Trade Marks Indian IPR - September 20, 2020 0 The standard of having “conspired or abetted or aided or induced” requires the intermediary... Intermediary Indian IPR - September 1, 2020 0 DB : Ss 79 and 81 of the I T Act and S. 51(a)(ii)... Intermediary Indian IPR - September 1, 2020 0 Court agreed to the defendant’s request to grant them (Ropso.com content sharing site) two... Copyright Indian IPR - September 1, 2020 0 LOOTCASE Vs Tukkaa Fitt’s movies, last day injunction sought HELD that the two movies are only... Copyright Indian IPR - August 30, 2020 0 HELD that use of the word ‘Luxuria’ infringes upon the trademark ‘Luxura’ for comfort... Trade Marks Indian IPR - August 30, 2020 0
