Copyright Jugjugg Jeeyo in a suit claiming copyright infringement – Injunction application to stay release of movies rejected by PO Commercial Court Ranchi June 26, 2022 Indian IPR
Copyright Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against News Nation, Suspects Defence Of ‘Fair Use’ in an non exclusive agreement termination case filed by Shemaroo Films’ RE Copyright Infringement Suit April 28, 2022April 28, 2022 Indian IPR
Copyright Supreme Court set aside the Madras High Court’s judgment that had modified the application of Rule 29(4) of Copyright Rules, 2013 applicable to the statutory licensing regime under Section 31D of the Copyright Act, finding that it rewrote the words of the statute. October 12, 2021October 12, 2021 Indian IPR
Copyright Held that the mere presence of a mark on the Register would not lead to automatic success in an action for infringement, and it was imperative to demonstrate continuous and sustained use of the mark to exemplify its distinctiveness. June 20, 2021 Indian IPR
Copyright HELD “…. the power to grant ad hoc compulsory licence, cannot be implied. No such detriment is demonstrated. In the absence of an express statutory grant, I would not imply the power to grant an ad hoc compulsory licence by way of interim order by the Copyright Board.” October 5, 2020October 5, 2020 Indian IPR
Copyright HELD A conjoint reading of Section 11 of the Copyright Act and Section 83 of the Trade Marks Act clearly indicates that the Appellate Board as constituted under Section 83 of the Trade Marks Act would also have the jurisdiction to perform the functions under the Copyright Act as well. October 5, 2020October 5, 2020 Indian IPR
Copyright Copyright Board fixes royalty rate at 2% of the net advertisement revenues of the radio organizations from radio business, charged on pro-rata basis. October 5, 2020 Indian IPR
Copyright Relying on the judgment of the Supreme Court in Indian Performing Rites Society vs. Sanjay Dalia wherein the jurisdiction for institution of suits was clarified by the Supreme Court after referring to Section 62 of the Copyright Act, 1957 and Section 134 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, the Court inter alia held that a suit can be filed at a place where the plaintiff has a principal place of office and not a subordinate office. September 20, 2020September 20, 2020 Indian IPR
Copyright Court agreed to the defendant’s request to grant them (Ropso.com content sharing site) two days time to sit with the plaintiff and ensure legal compliances September 1, 2020September 1, 2020 Indian IPR
Copyright LOOTCASE Vs Tukkaa Fitt’s movies, last day injunction sought HELD that the two movies are only similar so far as they revolve around a stolen bag full of money, but since no copyright subsists over themes, plots and ideas, there is no infringement. August 30, 2020August 30, 2020 Indian IPR
