Infringement - Trade Mark Registered trademark “KEI” HELD “interlocutory injunction, restraining the defendants, or their agents, sister concerns or any entity incorporated by the Defendants or anyone acting for and on their behalf as the case maybe, from using the impugned mark , in relation to any electrical goods or instruments, including electrical fans, room coolers, geysers, electric heating apparatus etc., or any allied or similar goods May 19, 2022 Indian IPR
Infringement - Trade Mark Injunction granted – Plaintiff’s mark ‘ATLANTIS’, owing to the unique nature of the resorts which are run by it, have prima facie, gained enormous global reputation, especially in the Indian subcontinent.” May 18, 2022 Indian IPR
Infringement - Trade Mark High Court grants relief to Raymond, restrains further sale of Vijaypat Singhania autobiography November 6, 2021 Indian IPR
Infringement - Trade Mark Interim injunction in a trademark infringement case involving the mark ‘B-COLEN’. HELD the defendant’s mark too closely resembled that of the plaintiff, who was the earlier registered proprietor. The defendant’s mark was held to be confusingly and deceptively similar to that of the plaintiff’s mark and that the same increased the likelihood that the defendant’s product will be mistaken for that of the plaintiff’s product. November 3, 2021 Indian IPR
Infringement - Trade Mark Ex-parte injunction in favour of the plaintiff from infringing upon the trademark “Blue Heaven”. HELD that the defendant had adopted a similar mark and the same trade-dress as that of the plaintiff to pass-off its inferior goods as that of the plaintiff’s product, that the plaintiff had established a prima facie case, that the balance of convenience lies in their favour and irreparable loss would be caused to the plaintiff if an injunction were not granted. November 3, 2021 Indian IPR
Infringement - Trade Mark Ex-parte interim injunction in favour of the plaintiff’s trademark infringement involving the mark ‘Liv52’. Prima facie the defendant indulged in infringement of the plaintiff’s registered trademark and sought to pass off their products as associated with the plaintiff’s by using the marks ‘Liv55’ and ‘Liv999’. The defendant’s use of the mark sought to capitalize on the plaintiff’s goodwill. November 3, 2021November 3, 2021 Indian IPR
Infringement - Trade Mark HELD “The defendant has adopted the domain name www.bharatmatrimony.org, which is squarely prohibited under Section 29 of the Trademark Act as infringement. Under Section 29(3), if the identical mark used for identical service, the Court shall presume the infringement.” Permanent injunction granted to ensure that the trademark, bharatmatrimony.com is not infringed October 19, 2021 Indian IPR
Infringement - Trade Mark The Delhi District Court (Tis Hazari) granted a permanent injunction restraining the M/s New Krishna Glass & Hardware, defendant from using their ‘GREEN FOREST’ mark or any marks deceptively similar to the plaintiff’s registered ‘GREEN’ mark. The court also ordered delivery up of the infringing goods and directed the defendant to pay Rs. 1 lakh to the plaintiff for the illegal profit in addition to the plaintiff’s suit fees assessed at Rs. 22,000 October 17, 2021 Indian IPR
